That could become a problem, couldn't it? The inconsistency, that is - if this place is some sort of record as it purports itself to be, then hopefully the "information" we represent here isn't so easily lost. [ He looks again at these cats: at a glance through sleepy eyes they had seemed fairly normal, but a closer look certainly reveals this is not the case. So many of them have dysfunctional or semi-functional appendages in just the right places to look normal at only one angle. Some of them just have floating parts entirely, or are missing crucial parts of their anatomy for survival. Linhardt makes a bit of a face at this consideration. ] ...Are you by any chance the sort to be interested in a little bit of research?